• Diving Deep into Jonah: The Great Fish, Divine Mercy, and the Sign of the Messiah

    Hello, friends in faith! Welcome back to our ongoing series on the Book of Jonah. I’m thrilled to dive into this profound story once again. If you’re new here, be sure to look around our website for more resources, teachings, and ways to connect. You can also reach me anytime at 1-575-912-3071—I’m not just an 8-to-5 kind of guy; call whenever the Spirit moves you. Don’t forget to share this on Facebook, YouTube, Twitch, or wherever you fellowship online. Amen!

    Just a quick reminder: Today marks the last Shabbat of the ninth month. Join us next Thursday, December 18, 2025, at 5:00 PM for our tenth-month celebration. It’ll be a short teaching, some praise, and a time to blow the trumpet and make a joyful noise, just as Numbers chapter 10 instructs. This isn’t a Christmas service—far from it! It’s our monthly gathering to honor the beginnings of the months. And as always, stick around after the teaching for questions, comments, prayer requests, testimonies, and an opportunity to support the ministry through donations, tithes, and offerings.

    Now, let’s jump into the heart of today’s teaching: Jonah chapter 2 (starting from what many call chapter 1 verse 17). We’ll be reading from the Lexham English Bible, which I love for its clarity and for using the name Yehovah instead of just “the Lord.”

    The Mystery of Chapter Divisions: Why Start Chapter 2 at Verse 17?

    As I mentioned last week, ancient translations like the Aramaic Targums, Syriac, Latin Vulgate, Hebrew Tanakh, and Septuagint all treat Jonah 1:17 as the start of chapter 2. Even the Jewish Publication Society Bible and early commentators like Josephus see it that way. These divisions aren’t modern inventions—chapters and verses came later—but the original texts have clear markers separating sections.

    Yet, versions like the King James, English Standard, and New King James keep it in chapter 1. Why? I’ve searched high and low and still haven’t found a solid reason. Many scholars describe verses 17 and chapter 2:10 as “bookends” framing Jonah’s prayer. So, for this study, we’ll start chapter 2 here: “And Yehovah provided a large fish to swallow Jonah. And Jonah was in the belly of the fish three days and three nights.”

    The Great Fish: Not a Whale, But a Divine Appointment

    This verse is famous—Jonah swallowed by a “whale.” But the Hebrew word dag just means “fish,” a generic large one (gadol dag). Josephus was the first to call it a whale, but the Bible doesn’t specify. People know Jonah mostly for this, yet the fish is as insignificant as the worm or plant later in the book. It’s not the point!

    Everything in Jonah is “great” or exaggerated: the great city of Nineveh, the great storm, the great seas. This fish is just another tool Yehovah appoints, like the donkey that obeyed in Balaam’s story or the ravens that fed Elijah. Nature obeys instantly, while humans like Jonah rebel. Jonah gets his commission and runs to Tarshish; the captain tells him to pray, but he doesn’t. So much disobedience from a man of God!

    Yet, the fish obeys: It swallows (bala) Jonah for three days and three nights. This word bala appears in Jeremiah 51, where Babylon “swallows” Israel like a monster. Yehovah promises to make Babylon spit it out, drying up its “sea” (a symbol of chaos and death).

    Allegory or History? Parallels with Sea Monsters and Chaos

    Some, like early church father Origen, see Jonah as pure allegory. I believe it’s historical fact, but ancient writers blended the two—think Greek mythology taught as history. In Scripture, sea monsters like Leviathan and Rahab symbolize chaos nations like Egypt and Babylon. Yehovah crushes them, scattering them for birds (echoed in Revelation).

    The sea itself represents death: Unconquerable, undrinkable, a place of no survival. Babylon, landlocked, is “covered” by tumultuous waves in Jeremiah—figurative judgment. Similarly, Jonah’s fish bookends his prayer, mirroring Babylon swallowing and spewing out Israel.

    Jeremiah likely knew Jonah (or vice versa since the book doesn’t give us an accurate way to date it)—the parallels are too strong.

    The Sign of Jonah: Three Days and Three Nights in the New Testament

    This is the only part of Jonah explicitly mentioned in the Gospels. In Matthew 12:38-41, Pharisees demand a sign (miracle). Yeshua replies: “An evil and adulterous generation seeks a sign, but no sign will be given except the sign of the prophet Jonah.” Just as Jonah was three days and three nights in the fish’s belly, so the Son of Man will be in the heart of the earth.

    Yeshua affirms this as a real miracle, like Daniel in the lions’ den or Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego in the furnace. The miracle isn’t the fish—it’s survival! The fish is generic, minimal detail. The point: Resurrection.

    Parallels abound: Jonah preaches repentance to Nineveh (Gentiles); Yeshua starts with “Repent, for the kingdom is at hand.” Jonah disobeys; Yeshua obeys perfectly. Nineveh repents despite Jonah’s reluctance; Judah rejects Yeshua despite having Scriptures and synagogues, even though “Something greater than Jonah is here.”

    In Matthew 16:4 (and Mark 8), Yeshua repeats it while boarding a boat—ironic, given Jonah’s sea flight.

    Ancient Near East belief: Three days and three nights is the journey to Sheol (hell, the grave—a place of silence, no praise). Hosea 6:2: “After two days he will revive us; on the third day he will raise us up.” Paul echoes this in 1 Corinthians 15. Even pseudepigrapha like the Testament of the Twelve Patriarchs and 1 Samuel 30 show three days as the brink of death.

    John 11 emphasizes Lazarus dead four days—beyond resurrection hope. Jonah doesn’t die; he’s at death’s door in “the belly of Sheol” (Jonah 2:2).

    Salvation in the Depths: God Meets Us in Our Messes

    Notice: The fish isn’t a curse—it’s salvation! Jonah is hurled headfirst into the chaotic sea, running from Yehovah. Why a fish, not a bird? Because Jonah kept “going down”—to the boat’s belly, to the depths. Yehovah meets him there, in his mess, providing rescue.

    This is our story: God appoints salvation amid disobedience, just as Paul says in Romans, He meets us in our sins.

    We’ll pick up with Jonah’s prayer next time. For now, take your time with Scripture—pay attention to details. The fish is a footnote; the message is God’s protection for even disobedient children.

    Closing Prayer and Invitation

    Father, we thank and honor You for Your Word. Thank You for letting us be part of Your kingdom and understand Your grand plan. We have the Law, Prophets, New Testament, even Apocrypha and pseudepigrapha—help us trust Your Word over signs and miracles. Guide us to submit, not run like Jonah. Protect Your people this week; send angels around them amid the world’s trials. Amen.

    Many Blessings,

    Javier Holguin

  • Diving into Jonah (Part 1): The Prophet Who Ran — An Introduction to a Very Real Story

    Praise Him!

    Today we began a brand-new journey through one of the most misunderstood, most preached-on, and (sadly) most cartoon-ified books in the entire Bible: the book of Jonah (or Yona — יוֹנָה — with a Y).

    Let’s clear the water right from the start: this is not a fairy tale.
    This is not “VeggieTales theology.”
    This is not some ancient Jewish version of Pinocchio.

    Jonah is real history, real geography, real people — and most importantly, a real picture of the relentless mercy of God toward the very last people we think deserve it (which, spoiler alert, includes you and me).

    1. Who Was Jonah, Really?

    • His full name appears twice in Scripture: Jonah ben Amittai (Jonah son of Amittai).
    • 2 Kings 14:25 identifies him as a real, functioning prophet in the northern kingdom during the reign of Jeroboam II (around 780–750 BC), contemporary with Hosea and Amos.
    • He is from Gath-Hepher, a town only about 3 miles north of Nazareth — yes, the same area Messiah grew up in. Coincidence? Hardly. The One who spent three days in the heart of the earth grew up just down the road from the prophet who spent three days in the belly of the fish.

    An ancient Jewish tradition (found in the Lives of the Prophets, a work that goes back at least to the Second Temple period) actually claims Jonah was none other than the widow’s son whom Elijah raised from the dead in 1 Kings 17. We can’t prove it, but the fact is, we don’t know — but it’s fascinating that the boy who was raised from the dead becomes the prophet who preaches resurrection-level repentance to the Gentiles.

    2. His Name Means “Dove”

    In Hebrew, יוֹנָה (Yonah) = dove.
    Same word used for:

    • The dove Noah sent out (Genesis 8)
    • The dove that symbolizes the Holy Spirit at Yeshua’s baptism
    • The “eyes like doves” in Song of Solomon
    • The psalmist’s cry in Psalm 55:6 — “Oh that I had wings like a dove! I would fly away and be at rest.”

    Irony alert: Jonah the “dove” tries to fly away — but in exactly the wrong direction.

    3. Is Jonah Just a Children’s Story?

    People dismiss it because:

    • A man survives three days in a great fish — too bizarre!
    • A plant grows overnight and dies the next day — impossible!
    • A Hebrew prophet is sent to preach to wicked Gentiles — unprecedented!

    Yet every single location in the book is archaeologically attested: Nineveh, Joppa (Jaffa), Tarshish (likely in Spain or Sardinia).
    And yes, by the way, there are documented cases (one as recent as the 1890s) of men surviving inside large sea creatures for days.
    More importantly, Messiah Himself treated Jonah as historical fact:

    “For just as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of the great fish, so will the Son of Man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.” (Matthew 12:40)

    If Yeshua believed it was real, that settles it for me.

    4. The First Two Verses — And Already Everything Is Upside-Down

    Jonah 1:1–2 (NET)
    “The word of YHVH came to Jonah son of Amittai: ‘Go immediately to Nineveh, that great city, and announce judgment against it, for their **wickedness has come up before Me.’”

    Notice the shock factor:

    • No other prophet in the Hebrew Bible is ever commanded to go to a foreign capital and preach repentance. Prophets pronounce judgment against Gentile nations, but they don’t pack their bags and go to them.
    • Nineveh wasn’t just any city. It was the capital of Assyria — the brutal empire that would later wipe out the northern kingdom of Israel. To an Israelite, Nineveh was literally the capital of terrorism.

    God’s heart, even in the Old Testament, beats for the nations.

    5. Verse 3 — The Great Escape (That Wasn’t)

    “Instead, Jonah immediately headed the opposite direction toward Tarshish to escape from the commission of YHVH.”

    He doesn’t argue like Moses (“I stutter!”).
    He doesn’t negotiate like Jeremiah (“I’m too young!”).
    He just runs.

    He goes down to Joppa, pays the fare, and boards a ship heading as far west as you could sail in the ancient world — probably southern Spain. Nineveh was northeast. Jonah goes the exact opposite direction.

    And the text says he was trying to flee “from the presence (literally “the face”) of YHVH.”
    Did Jonah really think he could outrun an omnipresent God? Probably not. More likely he was trying to get as far away from the land of Israel, the temple, and the prophetic calling as possible.

    6. A Violent, Personal Storm (v. 4)

    “But YHVH hurled a great wind on the sea…”

    Notice the wording: YHVH hurled (literally “threw”) a violent storm.
    The Hebrew is almost comical — the ship itself “thought” it was about to break apart (the ship has more sense than the prophet!).

    The pagan sailors are about to teach the prophet a lesson in the fear of the Lord.

    Closing Thought for This Week

    The book of Jonah is only 48 verses long. You can read the whole thing in ten minutes.
    I challenge you: read it slowly this week. Ask the journalist questions:

    • Who is speaking?
    • Who is seeing?
    • What perspective are we given at this moment?
    • Why does the author keep using the word “great” (great city, great wind, great fish…)?

    You’ll discover one of the most beautifully crafted short stories in all of world literature — and, more importantly, a piercing revelation of the heart of God who loves the unlovely, pursues the runner, and uses even our rebellion to display His relentless mercy.

    Next week we’ll pick up right where the sailors start crying out to their gods and discover a sleeping prophet who needs a wake-up call of biblical proportions.

    Until then — may we all learn to run toward Nineveh, not away from it.

    Many Blessings,
    Javier Holguin Jr.

  • The Ninth Biblical Month: When the Scorpion’s Stinger Becomes a Butterfly

    Welcome to the ninth biblical month!

    As the sun rose on November 22, 2025, it stood in the ancient constellation of Scorpio (Scorpius) — the Scorpion. In Egyptian star-lore this same constellation was sometimes seen as a giant serpent, and its brightest decan (side-piece) is Ophiuchus, the Serpent-Holder or Serpent-Handler. The heavens are already whispering a story.

    A few nights ago we had the dark “new moon” — invisible to the eye, but perfect for stargazing. The sky was washed clean, and the constellations stood out in all their glory. The moon is called a “faithful witness in the sky” (Psalm 89:37), and right now it is testifying loudly.

    The Stinger That Lost Its Sting

    Look at the very tip of Scorpio’s tail — the place where the deadly stinger curves upward. That is exactly where modern telescopes have discovered the Butterfly Nebula (sometimes called the Bug Nebula). Discovered in 1826, it glows like a delicate, winged creature emerging from a cocoon.

    Think about that for a moment.

    At the spot designed for poison and death, the Father placed a butterfly — the universal picture of resurrection and transformation.

    “O Death, where is your sting?” (1 Cor 15:55)
    Right there in the heavens, the stinger has already become wings.

    The Same Butterfly Appears Three Times

    The Father didn’t stop with one picture. He repeated it:

    1. In Scorpio’s tail — the place of the curse becomes the place of new life.
    2. In the belly of Ophiuchus, the Serpent-Handler — the conqueror of the dragon carries new-creation life inside him.
    3. In the heart of the Northern Cross (inside Cygnus the Swan) — another butterfly nebula glows right on the cross that looked like defeat but birthed resurrection.

    Three times the message is shouted silently across the sky: death is swallowed up by life.

    Scorpions = Rebellion in Scripture

    Scripture repeatedly connects scorpions with rebellion and stubbornness:

    • Deuteronomy 8:15 — Because of Israel’s unbelief they were forced to wander in a wilderness “with its fiery serpents and scorpions.”
    • Ezekiel 2:6 — God tells the prophet not to fear the people, “though briars and thorns are with you and you sit on scorpions” — a perfect description of a rebellious house.
    • 1 Kings 12:11,14 — Rehoboam threatens to discipline the people “with scorpions” after they rebel against the house of David.
    • Jeroboam’s counterfeit feast in the eighth biblical month (1 Kings 12:32-33) fell under the sign of Scorpio — pure rebellion against God’s appointed times.

    Even today, many in America celebrate a late-November “thanksgiving” that was deliberately moved away from the biblical seventh-month Feast of Tabernacles. Coincidence? The heavens themselves mark the difference.

    The Promise Written in the Stars

    Daniel 12:3 declares:
    “And those who are wise shall shine like the brightness of the sky above,
    and those who turn many to righteousness, like the stars forever and ever.”

    This is not astrology or fortune-telling. This is the Creator using His own creation as a billboard that needs no translation — a message that speaks in every language, to every generation.

    The Authority We’ve Been Given

    Yeshua Himself tied it all together in Luke 10:19-20:
    “Behold, I have given you authority to tread on serpents and scorpions,
    and over all the power of the enemy, and nothing shall hurt you.
    Nevertheless, do not rejoice that the spirits are subject to you,
    but rejoice that your names are written in heaven.”

    Don’t celebrate the power to crush scorpions.
    Celebrate that you are no longer the scorpion.

    A Personal Invitation This Month

    This ninth month, the heavens are asking every one of us a question:

    Will you stay a scorpion — rebellious, stinging, cursed?
    Or will you let the sting become wings and be transformed into something beautiful?

    Look up tonight. Open stellarium.web (it’s free, no download needed), search “Butterfly Nebula,” “Ophiuchus,” or “Northern Cross,” and see the gospel written in light that has never dimmed.

    May this ninth month be one of transformation for you.
    May the stinger lose its poison in your life.
    May you emerge with wings.

    And may you shine like the stars forever and ever (Daniel 12:3).

    Blessings in the name of the One who turned the curse into resurrection life, Yehovah and His son Yeshua
    — Javier Holguin

  • Second Passover!?

    A Second chance

    What happens when you miss or are unable to join in during the first Passover (Pesach) and Unleavened Bread?

    If you just came to the truth and realize that ALL Scripture is for today or if you’ve been walking this walk out and realize that the calendar system you are on is incorrect or any multiple reasons why you may have not been able to celebrate these holy days.  We have an example of just this happening in the Law:  

    Numbers 9:6–8 (ESV)
    6And there were certain men who were unclean through touching a dead body, so that they could not keep the Passover on that day, and they came before Moses and Aaron on that day.
    7And those men said to him, “We are unclean through touching a dead body. Why are we kept from bringing the LORD’s offering at its appointed time among the people of Israel?”
    8And Moses said to them, “Wait, that I may hear what the LORD will command concerning you.”

         Here we have an example of people who want to do the commands but because of a death were unable to be a part of Passover.  First, we must look at something that is strange here in verse 6, the phrase “why are we kept from” which is made clear in the LXX (Septuagint, the Greek translation of the OT):

    Numbers 9:7 (LES2)
    7And so those men said to him, “We are unclean with respect to a human soul.
    So shall we miss presenting our gift to the Lord at its appointed time along with the sons of Israel?”

         Here we see how they understood that they will miss out on it, not questioning why someone is stopping them because no one, not even Moses knew what to do about their situation.   Let’s keep moving to see what Father said to Moses about this:

    Numbers 9:9–14 (ESV)
    9The LORD spoke to Moses, saying,
    10“Speak to the people of Israel, saying, If any one of you or of your descendants is unclean through touching a dead body, or is on a long journey, he shall still keep the Passover to the LORD.
    11In the second month on the fourteenth day at twilight they shall keep it. They shall eat it with unleavened bread and bitter herbs.
    12They shall leave none of it until the morning, nor break any of its bones; according to all the statute for the Passover they shall keep it.
    13But if anyone who is clean and is not on a journey fails to keep the Passover, that person shall be cut off from his people because he did not bring the LORD’s offering at its appointed time; that man shall bear his sin.
    14And if a stranger sojourns among you and would keep the Passover to the LORD, according to the statute of the Passover and according to its rule, so shall he do. You shall have one statute, both for the sojourner and for the native.”

         Father says, in the second month of the year, we are given an opportunity to keep the Passover even if you miss it because of something that is out of your control.  Notice v.13 though, there is an exception that makes it clear that if you miss the Passover just because, in rebellion, because you just don’t care about HIS word then, there is NO second chance.

         Here we also see that even if you are not a born Israelite you still have an opportunity to get things right with Yehovah.   We have an example of this happening later on in Scripture in 2 Chronicles 30 when the Law had been lost, the people had forgot and had not been taught God’s word.   

    2 Chronicles 29:6 (ESV)
    (Hezekiah speaking to the Levites) For our fathers have been unfaithful and have done what was evil in the sight of the LORD our God. They have forsaken him and have turned away their faces from the habitation of the LORD and turned their backs.

    Conclusion

    If you missed Passover because of any reason that was out of your control, then you have an opportunity to make things right.  It isn’t about trying to gain points but because we love our God and want to do what He says, Father is so merciful as to give us a second chance…that’s grace.

  • Divorce and Remarriage in the Bible: Part 3 – Paul’s Teachings in the N.T.

    Welcome back to our series on divorce and remarriage from a biblical perspective. This is Part 3, where we’ll dive into the writings of Paul in the New Testament letters. As I mentioned before, this is a massive topic, and I know I’ve only scratched the surface. If there’s something I haven’t covered or if you have questions like, “What about this verse?” or “How do we apply this in our context?”—next week, I’ll host a dedicated Q&A session. This won’t be marriage counseling; it’s strictly about exploring Scripture for instruction and inspiration.

    Remember, all Scripture is for our edification, but some cultural elements—like head coverings—don’t directly apply today (and no, head coverings aren’t about veils or cloth; that’s a topic for another day). If you have pushback or alternative views on these passages, bring them! We don’t have to agree on everything to be brothers and sisters in Messiah. Diversity in the body is what makes us unique, not robotic.

    Let’s jump in with a quick recap for context.

    Recap: The Foundation from Matthew 19

    In Matthew 19 (NIV), some Pharisees test Jesus by asking, “Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for any and every reason?” Jesus replies by pointing back to creation: “Haven’t you read that at the beginning the Creator ‘made them male and female,’ and said, ‘For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh’? So they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let no one separate.”

    When pressed further, Jesus explains, “Moses permitted you to divorce your wives because your hearts were hard. But it was not this way from the beginning. I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality (porneia), and marries another woman commits adultery.”

    This ties back to Deuteronomy 24, the only Old Testament passage directly addressing divorce and remarriage. The context is hardened hearts (echoing Jeremiah), and “porneia” encompasses a range of sexual immoralities like fornication, adultery, incest, and more. Divorce is permitted—not required—for these reasons, but it’s not for trivial matters like burnt food or messy habits. Importantly, this applies to married couples, not betrothed ones. Legitimate divorce allows remarriage, but only for porneia, not “any cause.”

    With that foundation, let’s turn to Paul’s letters, starting with Romans 7.

    Romans 7: Not About Divorce, But an Analogy for Freedom from Sin

    Many point to Romans 7 as a key text on divorce and remarriage, but I argue it has nothing to do with divorce. Let’s read it closely.

    Romans 7:1-3 (NIV): “Do you not know, brothers and sisters—for I am speaking to those who know the law—that the law has authority over someone only as long as that person lives? For example, by law a married woman is bound to her husband as long as he is alive, but if her husband dies, she is released from the law that binds her to him. So then, if she has sexual relations with another man while her husband is still alive, she is called an adulteress. But if her husband dies, she is released from that law and is not an adulteress if she marries another man.”

    Paul addresses believers who know the law (Torah). He’s not talking to unbelievers. The law (Deuteronomy 24) allows divorce and remarriage—you just can’t return to your first spouse. But here, Paul focuses on death, not divorce. A widow is free to remarry, but living with another man while married is adultery because no divorce has occurred.

    Paul continues in verse 4: “So, my brothers and sisters, you also died to the law through the body of Christ, that you might belong to another, to him who was raised from the dead, in order that we might bear fruit for God.”

    This is an analogy: Just as death ends a marriage covenant, we’ve “died” to the law of sin through Messiah, freeing us to “marry” righteousness and bear fruit for God. We’re released from what held us captive (sin), serving in the Spirit, not the old written code. The law itself is holy (verse 12), but sin used it to produce death. Paul contrasts the “law of sin and death” with God’s holy law.

    Romans 7 uses marriage as a metaphor for our relationship with God—we were “married” to sin but now to righteousness. It has zero to do with divorce guidelines.

    Historical Context: Marriage in the Greco-Roman World

    To understand Paul’s writings, consider the cultural backdrop. In David Instone-Brewer’s book Divorce and Remarriage in the Bible: The Social and Literary Context, he notes that Greco-Roman marriage certificates focused more on divorce provisions than death. Divorce was expected and common.

    Archaeologists have found first-century tombstones praising couples who stayed married until death—rare enough to engrave! Roman historians described women counting years by marriages, not emperors. Divorce was easy and frequent.

    This explains Jesus’ disciples’ shock in Mark 10: “If this is the situation between a husband and wife, it is better not to marry.” Jesus replies that marriage isn’t for everyone—some should remain eunuchs (celibate). Paul echoes this in 1 Corinthians 7.

    1 Corinthians 7: Practical Guidance on Marriage, Divorce, and Remarriage

    1 Corinthians 7 is a go-to chapter for those claiming remarriage is forbidden. Let’s break it down.

    Paul responds to the Corinthians’ questions: “Now for the matters you wrote about: ‘It is good for a man not to have sexual relations with a woman’” (verse 1). This counters asceticism forbidding marriage (echoed in 1 Timothy 4).

    Verse 2: “But since sexual immorality (porneia) is occurring, each man should have his own wife, and each woman her own husband.”

    No mention of “first” wife/husband—it’s “his own,” emphasizing monogamy over polygamy. This aligns with 1 Timothy 3:2 (“husband of one wife” or “one-woman man”) for overseers. It doesn’t disqualify remarried people; otherwise, Paul (unmarried) and childless leaders like Jesus would be out. Repentance covers past sins, including divorce.

    Verse 3-5: Husbands and wives must fulfill conjugal rights mutually. Don’t deprive each other except by agreement for prayer, then reunite to avoid temptation from lack of self-control.

    This echoes Exodus 21:10—if a man takes another wife (polygamy context), he can’t reduce the first’s food, clothing, or marital rights. If he does, she can leave freely (divorce). This applied even to slave wives elevated to full status. Jewish texts like the Mishnah and Dead Sea Scrolls extend this: Neglect or adultery grounds legitimate divorce.

    Paul notes differences between men and women—hormonal cycles affect desire. Conjugal rights should be given freely, not demanded, keeping the marriage bed undefiled (Hebrews 13:4).

    Verse 6-9: Paul wishes all were single like him (a concession, not command), but each has their gift. To the unmarried and widows: Stay single if you can, but marry if self-control lacks—better than burning with passion.

    “Unmarried” could include divorcees or never-married. Paul advocates remarriage for widows, debunking ideas that you’re “still married” after death (contra some like John Piper).

    Verse 10-11: To the married (not Paul, but the Lord): Wives shouldn’t separate (divorce); if she does, remain unmarried or reconcile. Husbands shouldn’t divorce.

    “Separate” and “divorce” were synonymous in Greco-Roman divorce certificates. Leaving home equaled divorce—no papers needed.

    Why “remain unmarried”? Context: “Present distress” (verse 26)—persecution or hardship in Corinth. Stay as you are to avoid added troubles. But verse 28 clarifies: If you marry, you haven’t sinned.

    Verse 12-16: To mixed marriages (Paul’s judgment): If an unbelieving spouse consents to stay, don’t divorce—the believer sanctifies the home. But if the unbeliever leaves, let them: “The brother or sister is not enslaved” (douleō, emphatic freedom, echoing Exodus 21’s release). You’re free from the marriage bond; God calls us to peace.

    Verse 17-24: Live as called—slave or free, married or not. Don’t become slaves to men (verse 23).

    Verse 25-28: On virgins/betrothed (Paul’s judgment): Due to distress, stay as is. But marriage isn’t sin.

    Verse 39-40: A wife is bound while her husband lives; if he dies, she’s free to remarry anyone—in the Lord. But Paul thinks singleness brings happiness.

    Paul advocates staying married but allows divorce for porneia, neglect (food/clothing/rights), or abandonment by unbelievers. Remarriage is permitted in legitimate cases.

    Conclusion: Stay Married if Possible, But Grace Abounds

    God hates divorce (Malachi 2:16, though translation is tricky), but permits it for hardened hearts. Better not to marry if you can’t commit to loving and submitting (Ephesians 5). Control urges or marry and endure “for better or worse.”

    I pray this blesses you. Next week: Q&A—rewatch if needed, and bring your thoughts! Shalom.

  • Divorce & Remarriage – Part 2: What Yeshua Actually Said (and Why Matthew Isn’t “Adding” Anything)

    This is the second dive into one of the touchiest topics in Scripture—divorce and remarriage. Last week we saw the Old Testament allows divorce (Deut 24) and that the marriage bond can be broken. This week we zoom in on Matthew 5 & 19, the famous “except for porneia” clause, and why Mark & Luke don’t contradict—they just give less context.


    1. The Big Question the Pharisees Asked

    Matthew 19:3 – “Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for any and every reason?”

    That phrase—“any cause”—is the exact debate that is happening in 1st-century Judaism.
    There are two major rabbinic schools:

    SchoolDivorce Allowed For…
    Hillel (liberal, still dominant today)ANY reason – burnt dinner, got ugly, “I just don’t like her anymore.”
    Shammai (strict)ONLY sexual indecency (adultery).

    Yeshua sides closer to Shammai—but takes the understanding much deeper.


    2. Yeshua’s Answer in Matthew 19:4–9

    1. “Haven’t you read?” → Genesis 2:24 – one man, one woman, one flesh.
      → Knocks out polygamy and flippant divorce.
    2. “Let no one separate” does not equal “cannot be separated.”
      → It’s a command, not an impossibility.
    3. “Moses permitted… because of your hardness of heart.”
      → Greek: sklērokardia = stubbornness.
      → Same word used in Jeremiah 4:4 (LXX) where God tells Israel to “circumcise your stubborn hearts” after repeated adultery.

    3. The Key Word: Porneia (Not Just “Adultery”)

    Matthew 5:32 & 19:9 – “…except for porneia…”

    • Porneia = any sexual immorality:
      → adultery, incest, homosexuality, cult prostitution, bestiality, etc.
    • Adultery (moicheia) is one kind of porneia.
    • Yeshua expands Shammai’s rule: any sexual sin can break the covenant.

    If divorce is for porneia, it’s legitimate → remarriage is not adultery.


    4. Why Mark & Luke Don’t Mention the Exception

    • Mark 10 & Luke 16 aren’t answering “Can you divorce for any reason?
    • They’re saying: “Stop treating marriage like a revolving door.”
    • Matthew was written so his readers would know the Hillel/Shammai debate.
    • Mark/Luke were written to those who most likely understood the context and would instinctively add the phrase “for any reason/cause.”

    Many times Matthew gives us more information that Mark and Luke, here is one example:

    Mark 8:12 – “No sign will be given…”
    Matthew 12:39 – “…except the sign of Jonah.”

    Matthew adds context, but he doesn’t contradict.

    Scholars have noted that Mark is written for a more oratory style, meaning that it is meant to be read aloud compared to Matthew which is more technical.


    5. Deuteronomy 24:1 – The Word That Started the Fight

    “…because he found some indecency (ervat davar) in her…”

    SchoolInterpretation
    ShammaiIndecent matter → sexual sin only.
    HillelMatter of indecencyANY matter (even bad cooking).

    Yeshua: “Only porneia.”
    → Rejects Hillel’s loopholes.
    → Expands Shammai to all sexual covenant-breaking.


    6. God Himself Divorced Israel—But Took Her Back

    Jeremiah 3:1, 8 (LXX) – “I sent her away… I gave her a certificate of divorce.”
    Jeremiah 3:14 – “Return, faithless children…”

    • Divorce was allowed (not commanded).
    • Forgiveness was always the goal.
    • Same with human marriage: Stay if possible. Forgive if they repent.
    • This aligns with Messiah’s teaching about forgiveness in Luke 17:3-4

    7. Bottom Line

    1. Marriage is for life – one man, one woman, one family.
    2. Divorce is allowed (not mandatory) for porneia.
    3. Remarriage after a legitimate divorce is not adultery.
    4. Forgiveness is greater than divorce when there are fruits of repentance.

    Next week: Paul, Romans 7, 1 Corinthians 7 – spoiler: they’re NOT about divorce/remarriage.


    Recommended Reading:
    Divorce & Remarriage in the Bible – David Instone-Brewer (2002, Eerdmans)


    Many Blessings,

    Javier Holguin

  • Divorce and Remarriage: An Introduction (Part 1)

    Today we begin a multi-week study on one of the most sensitive and controversial topics in Scripture: divorce and remarriage. I’ve taught on marriage before, but as I’ve grown in understanding the Word, I’ve realized some things I once held as absolute truth simply aren’t. My goal isn’t to push one view—I’ll present all sides of the argument, including mine, with Scripture as the final authority. Let Scripture interpret Scripture. Not man. Not tradition. Not denomination.

    “Let Scripture interpret Scripture. Not man, not religion, not denomination.”

    We’re not covering every verse today—this is an introduction. We’ll compare key passages, especially in the Gospels and the Torah, and next week we’ll dive deep into Matthew 5, Matthew 19, and Deuteronomy 24.


    A Word Before We Begin

    I am not advocating for divorce. From Genesis to Revelation, God hates the breaking of covenant. Yeshua (Jesus) and Paul consistently call couples to stay together. Even the Father, in His relationship with Israel, works tirelessly to preserve the marriage—though He does say, “I gave her a certificate of divorce” (Jer. 3:8). More on that later.

    This teaching will touch real lives—friends, family, leaders, believers. Nearly every person knows someone who’s been divorced or remarried. There’s gray area. There’s pain. So I’ll speak carefully—but truthfully.


    The Modern Context: No-Fault Divorce

    Before 1969, divorce in the U.S. was rare and heavily restricted. In the 1930s, you could only divorce for adultery (sometimes abuse or neglect). People even faked affairs—renting hotel rooms, hiring private investigators, staging photos—just to get court approval.

    Then came Ronald Reagan and the No-Fault Divorce Law (1969). Suddenly, you could divorce for any reason—or no reason. Rates skyrocketed and have never come down.

    Today? Divorce is everywhere. Remarriage usually follows. This isn’t just a “world” problem—it’s in our congregations, our families, our mirrors.


    Where the Controversy Begins: Luke 16:18

    Let’s start with the verse many use to say remarriage is always adultery:

    Luke 16:18 (ESV)
    “Everyone who divorces his wife and marries another commits adultery, and he who marries a woman divorced from her husband commits adultery.”

    King James says “putteth away” — old language. Today we say divorce. Clear enough.

    But wait—how is divorce itself adultery?
    If divorce ends the marriage (breaks the contract), how can remarriage be adultery?

    Think of a cell phone contract: stop paying → service ends → contract broken. Same with marriage, right?

    Or… maybe not.


    Context Matters: Luke 16 Isn’t the Full Story

    Luke 16:14–18 is a snippet. The Pharisees are sneering at Yeshua over money. He says the Law doesn’t pass away—then drops verse 18.

    But look at the NIV footnote (little “g”):
    → Matt. 5:31–32, 19:9; Mark 10:11; Rom. 7:2–3; 1 Cor. 7:10–11

    These verses are linked. We’ll get to all of them. But today: Gospels + Torah.


    Matthew Adds a Key Exception

    Matthew 5:31–32 (ESV)

    “It was also said, ‘Whoever divorces his wife, let him give her a certificate of divorce.’ But I say to you that everyone who divorces his wife, except on the ground of sexual immorality (porneia), makes her commit adultery…”

    Porneia = Greek root of “pornography.” Sexual sin.

    Side-by-side:

    Luke 16:18Matthew 5:32
    Divorces + remarries → adulteryExcept porneia, makes her commit adultery
    Marrying divorced woman → adulterySame

    Matthew was a disciple (eyewitness). Luke got secondhand info. Matthew gives more detail—including an exception.


    The Pharisees’ Trap: Mark 10 & Matthew 19

    Mark 10:2–9
    Pharisees: “Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife?”
    Yeshua: “What did Moses command?”
    Pharisees: “Moses allowed a certificate of divorce.”
    Yeshua: “Because of your hardness of heart… but from the beginning, ‘male and female,’ ‘the two shall become one flesh.’ Let not man separate.”

    Note: Yeshua quotes the Septuagint (“the two”)—not Masoretic (“they”). This shuts down polygamy arguments.

    Then privately to disciples (v.10–12):

    “Whoever divorces his wife and marries another commits adultery against her. And if she divorces her husband and marries another, she commits adultery.”

    No exception here. But wait…


    Matthew 19: The Full Question

    Matthew 19:3

    “Is it lawful to divorce for any and every reason?”

    Ah! Now we see the real debate. Not “Can you divorce?” but “Can you divorce for any cause?”

    Yeshua answers with creation, then:

    v.9“Whoever divorces his wife, except for porneia, and marries another, commits adultery.”

    If divorce is for sexual immorality → NOT adultery.


    So What Does the Torah Say?

    The Pharisees said, “Moses allowed it.” Let’s check.

    Deuteronomy 24:1–4 (ESV)

    “When a man takes a wife… if she finds no favor… because he has found some indecency in her, and he writes her a certificate of divorce… and she departs…
    And if she goes and becomes another man’s wife
    Then her former husband… may not take her again…”

    Key points:

    • Divorce ends the marriage.
    • Remarriage is legitimate (second marriage not called adultery).
    • Second husband can divorce or die—both end marriage.
    • First husband is former—contract broken.
    • First husband taking her back = abomination.

    Israel had divorce rights for women—unheard of in ancient Near East. Certificate protected her from being reclaimed.


    Deuteronomy 22:13–19

    Man marries, accuses wife of not being virgin. If false → he pays fine and “may not divorce her all his days.”

    Why say that if divorce is never allowed?


    Numbers 30:9

    “But any vow of a widow or divorced woman… shall stand.”

    Divorced woman = widow in authority. No husband over her.


    Leviticus 21:7, 13–14

    • Priests: Cannot marry divorced woman, prostitute, defiled.
    • High Priest: Cannot marry widow or divorced—must be virgin.

    → Average Israelite could marry divorced/widowed (e.g., Rahab, Hosea).


    So What’s the Answer?

    QuestionTorahYeshua
    Can you divorce?Yes (Deut. 24)Yes, but hard hearts (Matt. 19:8)
    Can you remarry?YesYes, if divorce valid (porneia)
    Is remarriage always adultery?NoNo—only if invalid divorce

    Luke & Mark give partial pictures.
    Matthew + Torah = full context.


    Next Shabbat: Part 2

    • Deep dive: Matthew 5, 19 + Deuteronomy 24
    • Then: Prophets, Paul (Romans 7 is not about remarriage!)

    Final Exhortation

    I’m not saying “get divorced.”
    I’m saying: Read the Word for yourself.

    “Test everything. Hold fast what is good.” – 1 Thess. 5:21
    Be like the Bereans (Acts 17:11).

    If this challenges you—good. Search the Scriptures.


    Yehovah bless you and keep you
    Yehovah make His face shine upon you and be gracious to you
    Yehovah lift up His countenance upon you and give you peace
    In Yeshua’s name, Amen.


    Questions? Comments? Prayer requests?
    Leave them below or join us live next Shabbat.

    Blessings,

    Javier Holguin

  • Moon or Month?

    Where do we get the idea of looking for a “new moon” for the start of a month?

    We have been doing the traditional way of sighting the first crescent moon for the start of the month for almost 9 years until……

         A few months ago, I was able to get the Biblical software Logos and within the library there is a book about the traditions of the Canaanites along with other texts from the Near East called, “Ancient Near Eastern Texts Relating to the Old Testament (3rd Edition with Supplement).”  And just casually reading this book, I came across a text that was “A prayer to the Moon God” which was named “Sin.”  This along with many other texts including another prayer to the Sun God, was more focused on the Moon.  Even the prayer to the Sun called the Moon “his father,” in other words the sun according to the Canaanites was of less importance than the moon.  This started a path that I believe was only started by Yehovah himself because I was completely sure of what I was doing, even though I had never fully examined it.

         I then began a study about the word usually translated month, ‘Chodesh/hodesh’ which James Strong, A Concise Dictionary of the Words in the Greek Testament and The Hebrew Bible says this:

        2320. חֹדֶשׁ chôdesh, kho´-desh; from 2318; the new moon; by implication a month:

    —month (-ly), new moon

    The root, or where this word comes from is:

    2318. חָדַשׁ châdash, khaw-dash´; a prim. root; to be new; caus. to rebuild:—renew, repair.

    This word is used 277 times in the KJV bible and is never used as “moon” or “new moon” until 1 Samuel 20:5:

    1 Samuel 20:5 (ESV) David said to Jonathan, “Behold, tomorrow is the new moon (chodesh), and I should not fail to sit at table with the king. But let me go, that I may hide myself in the field till the third day at evening.

    It amazed me that it was never translated as moon during the Torah or the Judges but only after King Saul was trying to kill David!  Why wait so long to translate this as moon, why not earlier?  Maybe because the moon didn’t have a place in the observation of the month until much later and many of the English translators of many Bibles understood that putting “new moon” for “month” wouldn’t make sense in the context or application of the verses being translated like in 

    Leviticus 27:5–6 (ESV) 5.If the person is from five years old up to twenty years old, the valuation shall be for a male twenty shekels, and for a female ten shekels. 6.If the person is from a month old up to five years old, the valuation shall be for a male five shekels of silver, and for a female the valuation shall be three shekels of silver.

    If this verse said, ‘a new moon old’, it wouldn’t make sense because a lunar month is so short and unpredictable if you have to wait to observe it and not calculate it.  Which by the way, even in 1 Samuel David tells Jonathan that “tomorrow is the chodesh.”  How did he know that the following day was going to be the new moon, unless it was the 29th day and a lunar month can never be longer than 30 days because a lunar month is exactly 29.5 days long.  Unless they weren’t using the moon to calculate the month.

         Notice how the word chodesh doesn’t have a root that has anything to do with moon but renewed or repair.  So why does the month get associated with the moon in Scripture?  Even though the English word month comes from the word moon, we don’t use the moon for any month ever so why would we suppose that Hebrew word for month, chodesh, has anything to do with the moon?  We can see where this tradition began and even see how this tradition is not in Scripture.

    The Babylonian Talmud, Volumes 1–20: Original Text, Edited, Corrected, Formulated, and Translated into English (Introduction to Tract Rosh Hashana (New Year’s Day))


    After Rabbi Jehudah Hanassi had completed the proper Mishnaic arrangement regarding the number of New Year’s days, making the principal one “the Day of Memorial” (the first of Tishri); after treating upon the laws governing the sounding of the cornet in an exceedingly brief manner—he dwells upon the custom in vogue at the Temple of covering the mouth of the cornet or horn with gold, and declares the duty of sounding the cornet properly discharged if a person passing by the house of worship can hear it.


    First of all, notice how in Judaism there is more than one New Year’s Day and they consider the “principal one” the first day of the 7th month, Tishri is the Jewish name for the 7th month but continuing on…


    He arranges the prayers accompanying this ceremony in a few words, and then dilates at great length upon the Mishnayoth treating of the lunar movements by which alone the Jews were guided in the arrangement of their calendar, upon the manner of receiving the testimony of witnesses, concerning the lunar movements, and upon the phases of the moon as used by Rabban Gamaliel. He then elaborates upon the tradition handed down to him from his ancestors (meaning thereby the undisputably correct regulations), and also upon the statutes ordained by Rabban Johanan ben Zakkai, enacting that the sages of each generation are the sole arbiters of all regulations and ordinances, and may themselves promulgate decrees even though the bases for such be not found in the Mosaic code.

    Notice how Rabbi Gamaliel is the one who began using the moon to arrange prayers yet according to the Talmud itself, it notes that the bases for such, using the moon for the calendar, is not found in the Mosaic code!  So why would they add a tradition and make it so that everyone has to obey it?  This is one of the reasons why Messiah said in Mark 7:8-9:

    Mark 7:8–9 (ESV)
    8You leave the commandment of God and hold to the tradition of men.”
    9And he said to them, “You have a fine way of rejecting the commandment of God in order to establish your tradition!

    Why would the religious leaders add something like this when there is no basis in Scripture?  Where would they have gotten this idea?  When I show you the origin and the path that this goes, if you are like me will be shocked but at the same time will understand why.

    Origin of the New Moon observation

    Morris Jastrow Jr., The Religion of Babylonia and Assyria (Boston, MA: Ginn & Company Publishers, 1898), pg.98.

    It will be borne in mind that in the city of Ur, the sun-god occupied a secondary place at the side of the moon-god. This relationship is probably indicated by the epithet ‘offspring of Nin-gal,’ accorded to Shamash in the inscription referred to. The moon being superior to the sun, the consort of the moon-god becomes the mother of the sun-god.

    In Ur where Abram was called out of and told to leave his family is also the center of moon worship in Babylonia.  Remember that Rachel, Jacob’s wife had stolen her father’s idols?  Laban was from Abraham’s home country which his name means to be white.  So, what kind of idol did Rachel steal?  Where he was from and considering the history of his country, I would put my money on the idea that it had to do with the moon.  

         Interestingly after the Greeks took over Israel, the people took on the Greek culture and wanted to be like them, even the priests were Greek appointed.    It is known fact that the Greeks began their day in the evening, and they started their months by the sliver of the new moon.  With both the Babylonians and the Greeks, Israel as a whole took on the Babylonian month names like “Tammuz” and “Nisan” and began their day in the evening like both nations, so why do most leave out the rest of their calendar system.  The truth is sometimes hard to admit because we have been shoved tradition in our face for so long yet even after the Messiah, we have writings like the “Preaching of Peter” that talk against these things:

    Montague Rhodes James, ed., The Apocryphal New Testament: Being the Apocryphal Gospels, Acts, Epistles, and Apocalypses (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1924), 17.

    Neither worship ye him as do the Jews, for they, who suppose that they alone know God, do not know him, serving angels and archangels, the month and the moon: and if no moon be seen, they do not celebrate what is called the first sabbath, nor keep the new moon, nor the days of unleavened bread, nor the feast (of tabernacles?), nor the great day (of atonement).

    In Conclusion

    So, you have to make a choice, do you go off by the moon for a month like the Babylonians, Greeks and Judaism or use the signs that Father gave us in Genesis 1, the sun, moon and stars.

    Be blessed and happy searching!

  • Amos Chapter 9: Judgment and Restoration

    Amos chapter 9, though only 15 verses, delivers a powerful conclusion to the prophet’s message. Unlike the symbolic visions of chapters 7 and 8—where God shows Amos locusts, fire, or a basket of summer fruit and asks, “What do you see?”—chapter 9 unveils a direct revelation. The veil lifts, and Amos sees Yehovah standing at the heart of worship, pronouncing judgment and promising restoration.

    Yehovah at the Altar – Striking the Heart of Worship

    Amos 9:1 opens with a striking image: “I saw Yehovah standing by the altar.” This is the temple altar, post-Solomon, in the outer court where sacrifices were visible to all. The Septuagint reads, “Strike the mercy seat,” while the NIV and KJV mention smiting the “capitals” or “lintel” of the temple structure—ornamental pillar tops, possibly echoing the menorah’s floral design, that provide stability. Yehovah targets the core of worship, shaking its foundations. Without the mercy seat or the ark, the temple is empty, and false worship—evident in Jeroboam’s era with its wrong days, places, and practices—faces divine rejection. “The gateways will be shaken,” and none will escape judgment.

    No Place to Hide from Divine Judgment

    Verses 2-4 emphasize the inescapability of God’s judgment. Whether hiding in Sheol, ascending to heaven, retreating to Mount Carmel’s summit, or sinking into the sea’s depths, Yehovah’s reach is absolute. He commands the “dragon” (nachash in Hebrew, drakōn in Greek), a term tied to Leviathan (Job 41, Isaiah 27:1) and the serpent of Genesis 3, showing His sovereignty even over chaos. In captivity, the sword awaits. “I will set my eyes upon them for evil, not for good,” declares Yehovah, underscoring that false worship and pride offer no security.

    Sovereign Over Creation

    Verses 5-6 affirm Yehovah’s dominion. As “Adonai Yehovah,” He shakes the earth, summons the sea, and builds the heavens—not merely conquering like pagan gods but creating. No corner of creation is beyond His reach, reinforcing the futility of escaping His judgment.

    No Favorites Among Sinners

    In verses 7-8, Yehovah challenges Israel’s complacency: “Are you not like the Kushites to me?” The Exodus, a pivotal event, doesn’t grant automatic favor. Like the Philistines or Arameans, Israel faces judgment as part of the “kingdom of sinners.” Yet, mercy persists: “I will not completely remove the house of Jacob.” J. Maier notes in The Message of Amos that Israel treated the Exodus like a talisman, akin to believing “a man shall live forevermore because of Christmas Day.” Past events don’t guarantee salvation; only repentance does.

    The Winnowing Sift

    Verses 9-10 describe God’s sifting of Israel among the nations, like grain tossed to separate seed from chaff. Sinners who claim, “Evil won’t touch us,” face the sword. This challenges notions like “once saved, always saved,” echoing Messiah’s call to endure (Luke 22). False security in religion or lineage crumbles.

    The Pivot to Restoration – “Your God”

    Verses 11-15 shift to hope. Yehovah promises to “raise up the tent of David,” a reference to the Messiah and the Feast of Tabernacles. This restoration extends to “the remnant of the people” and “all nations” seeking Him (Acts 15 quotes this, using “mankind” over “Edom”). The earth will flourish, captives return, cities rebuild, and Israel’s people will be planted in their land, never uprooted. This fivefold restoration—king, nations, earth, people, land—culminates in Yehovah as “your God,” a promise of enduring relationship despite judgment.

    Amos 9 confronts false worship and pride but offers hope through repentance and restoration. Read the full book to grasp its context, and let it challenge assumptions about security in religion or heritage. Yehovah’s word, though piercing, calls us to endure and seek His kingdom.

    Yehovah bless you and keep you. Yehovah make His face shine upon you and be gracious. Yehovah lift His countenance upon you and give peace in Yeshua’s name. Amen.

  • Evening or morning, Genesis 1:3-5 ?
    • In Genesis, does the day start with the evening?
    • This is the first in a series of verses that we will look at in detail,
    • to see what Scripture says about when a day begins.

         Genesis 1 consistently says, “…there was evening and there was morning…,” then following is the number of the day.  When I read this after realizing that I needed to be keeping the Sabbath and doing the Feasts appointed in Scripture was that my understanding of when the day begins needs to be aligned with Scripture.  The only thing is that, just like in my previous denomination, I looked to leadership to tell me and just followed along.  Because of my lack of searching, I was simply aligned with the ‘Jewish’ reckoning of the day, evening to evening.  For years that is what my family and I did, until one day, one phone call made me prove what I stood on.  

         I began with Genesis 1:

    Genesis 1:3–5 (ESV) 
    3And God said, “Let there be
    light,” and there was light.
    4And God saw that the
    light was good. And God separated the light from the darkness.
    5God called the
    light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And there was evening and there was morning, the first day.

    (emphasis mine)

    The very first thing we see is that God creates light and each time we see the word light in these verses it is the Hebrew word א֖וֹר (or):

    The Lexham Analytical Lexicon of the Hebrew Bible (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2017)
    אוֹר ôr, n.c., daylight, light, dawn. 121x

    Here is another dictionary entry, if you have a little bit of understanding of Hebrew, this will make more sense but if not just read the English:

    James Swanson, Dictionary of Biblical Languages with Semantic Domains : Hebrew (Old Testament)

    (Oak Harbor: Logos Research Systems, Inc., 1997).

    240 II. אוֹר (ʾôr): n.masc.; ≡ Str(Strongs) 216; TWOT(Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament) 52a

    1. LN(Louw-Nida) 14.36–14.52 light, i.e., that which is contrasted to darkness (Ge 1:3), note: in some contexts with the associative meaning of

    guidance, health, life, prosperity, enlightened judgment, and other positive things;

    2. LN 1.26–1.33 sun, i.e., the orb in the daytime sky giving bright light and heat (Job 37:21);

    3. LN 14.36–14.52 sunshine, light of day, i.e., daylight in contrast to the dark of night (2Ki 7:9);

    4. LN 14.15–14.16 lightning, i.e., the bright, destructive spikes that precede thunder (Hos 6:5);

    5. LN 67.73–67.77 unit: אוֹר הַ־ בֹּקֶר (ʾôr hǎ- bō·qěr) dawn, i.e., the time when light of day first appears (Jdg 16:2), note: Ge 44:3; Jer 31:35; 1Sa 29:10 may be interp as 239, q.v.;

    6. LN 58.14–58.18 unit: אוֹר פָּנֶה (ʾôr pā·ně(h)) bright countenance, formally, light of the face,

    i.e., an appearance of the face that shows positive, happy attitude (Job 29:24; Pr 16:15);

    7. LN 22.42–22.47 unit: אוֹר פָּנֶה (ʾôr pā·ně(h)) favor, formally, light of the face,

    i.e., favorable circumstances, and relief from trouble and danger (Ps 4:7[English Bible 6]; 44:4[EB 3])

    Now obviously the sun, moon or stars aren’t created yet.  The only thing that is there before the light is darkness and water, elements that are associated with chaos.  Now before there is a sunrise or sunset, there is light and darkness which are separated and each one is given a title, light becomes day and dark becomes night.  Before we get to those titles, let’s look at what the darkness is…

    Genesis 1:3–5 (ESV)
    3And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light.
    4And God saw that the light was good. And God separated the light from the
    darkness.
    5God called the light Day, and the
    darkness he called Night. And there was evening and there was morning, the first day.

    (emphasis mine)

    Here you have the opposite of light which is darkness.  Here the Hebrew word is hoshek, which is also the same word used in v.2 when the “darkness” was over the deep.  Let’s look at the definition of this word:

    Richard Whitaker et al., The Abridged Brown-Driver-Briggs Hebrew-English Lexicon of the Old Testament: From A Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament by Francis Brown, S.R. Driver and Charles Briggs, Based on the Lexicon of Wilhelm Gesenius (Boston; New York: Houghton, Mifflin and Company, 1906).

    חֹשֶׁךְ n.m. darkness, obscurity —

    1. darkness (opp. אוֹר); darkness in mines; of extraordinary darkness, in Egypt, from pillar of cloud; at Mt. Sinai; of clouds of theophany; of darkness in death, or She˓ôl (ˊח‍ אִישׁוֹן = extreme of darkness).

    2. = secret places(s); = hiding-place.

    3. fig., a. = distress (fig. of blindness). b. = dread, terror, symbol. of judgment. c. = mourning. d. = perplexity; confusion. e. ignorance. f. = evil, sin. g. = obscurity.

    Also see:

    James Swanson, Dictionary of Biblical Languages with Semantic Domains:

    Hebrew (Old Testament) (Oak Harbor: Logos Research Systems, Inc., 1997).

    3125 חֹשֶׁךְ (ḥō·šěḵ): n.masc.; ≡ Str 2822; TWOT 769a—

    1. LN 14.53–14.62 darkness, the dark, i.e., the lack of light in a space (Ge 1:4; Ex 10:21), note: there are many associative meanings to “darkness,” including terror, ignorance, sadness, confusion, evil;

    2. LN 79.26–79.38 blackness, i.e., the color of an object (Dt 4:11);

    3. LN 28.68–28.83 unit: אוֹצָר חֹשֶׁךְ (ʾô·ṣār ḥō·šěḵ) valuable secrets, formally, treasures of darkness (Isa 45:3);

    4. LN 22.1–22.14 unit: יוֹם חֹשֶׁךְ (yôm ḥō·šěḵ) time of distress, formally, day of darkness (Job 15:23)

    Clearly, we see the distinctions of both light and darkness and how they are complete opposites of each other.  Even in the figurative language, the light is seen as favorable and a time of relief, but darkness is distress and terror.  Immediately we see that Father takes control over the things you can’t see, the time in which is uncertain and the waters which are untamed and unpredictable and makes them visible and easier even for us.  Now we have a division of time and God calls each one differently, light is called day and darkness is night.  

         Darkness is now night which is the Hebrew word “leyla.”  

    Dictionary of Biblical Languages with Semantic Domains:

    4326 לַיְלָה (lǎy·lā(h)): n.masc.; ≡ Str 3915; TWOT 1111—

    1. LN 67.192 night, i.e., a period of time from the setting to the rising of the sun, so with a focus of lacking light (1Sa 14:34), see also 4325;

    2. LN 14.53–14.62 darkness, i.e., a lack of light as a focus opposed to daylight (Pr 31:15);

    3. LN 67.93 unit: אַרְבַּע לַיְלָה (ʾǎr·bǎʿ lǎy·lā(h)) a long time, formally, forty nights, i.e., possibly a symbolic representation of a considerable period of time (1Ki 19:8), note: some also view forty nights as a mathematically exact numeral;

    4. LN 67.73–67.77 unit: חֲצוֹת הַ־ לַיְלָה (ḥǎṣôṯ hǎ- lǎy·lā(h)) midnight, formally, half the night, i.e., a point of time halfway between the setting and rising of the sun (Ex 11:4);

    5. LN 67.78–67.141 unit: לַיְלָה וְ־ יוֹמָם (lǎy·lā(h) w- yô·mām) continually, constantly, formally, night and day, i.e., a duration of time without limits (Dt 28:66);

    6. LN 67.78–67.141 unit: לַיְלָה וְ־ יוֹם (lǎy·lā(h) w- yôm) continually, constantly, formally, night and day, i.e., a duration of time without limits (1Ki 8:29);

    7. LN 67.78–67.141 unit: בֵּן לַיְלָה הָיָה (bēn lǎy·lā(h) hā·yā(h)) grow and mature very fast, formally, son of night, i.e., become mature plant in a time period of overnight (Jnh 4:10)

    The first thing to notice is that the word for night is never used by itself for a full 24 hour period, it is always accompanied by the word for “day” to denote a full day and night.  Yet unlike the words for night and darkness that only refer to the dark period of the day, destruction, terror, secrets and all the things that are obscure and unclear we have in Genesis 1:5 the word “yom”, day:

    Genesis 1:3–5 (ESV)
    3And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light.
    4And God saw that the light was good. And God separated the light from the darkness.
    5God called the light
    Day, and the darkness he called Night. And there was evening and there was morning, the first day.

    (emphasis mine)

         Just a simple reading we can easily see how the word “day” is used not just for the light but also for the entire 24-hour period by the use of the same word at the end of the verse denoting the whole “first day.”  Let’s look at this word:

    Dictionary of Biblical Languages with Semantic Domains: 

    3427 I. יוֹם (yôm): n.masc.; ≡ Str 3117; TWOT 852—

    1. LN 67.163–67.200 day, i.e., a unit of time reckoned from sunset to the next sunset, including two or more segments (morning and evening) about 24 hours (Ge 1:5), cf. also 3429;

    2. LN 67.163–67.200 day, i.e., the period of time which has light (Ge 1:5);

    3. LN 67.142–67.162 time period, formally, day, i.e., an indefinite time period, ranging from relatively short to very long, years and beyond (Ex 2:23);

    4. LN 14.36–14.52 daylight, i.e., the light of the sun as an extension of day as the time which has light (Jer 6:4);

    5. LN 67.201–67.208 unit: הַ־ יוֹם (hǎ- yôm) today, i.e., the same day as the day of the discourse (Ge 4:14);…

    This definition goes on to explain up to 28 uses so I encourage you to look it up in its entirety, but I think this should suffice for now.

         Notice how this word is used not just for daylight hours but also for a full day including the night without the addition of “layla.”  It is also used for multiple days and even for a lifetime as in Ecclesiastes 6:3 (ESV):

    If a man fathers a hundred children and lives many years, so that the days(yemi-lemma is yom) of his years are many, but his soul is not satisfied with life’s good things, and he also has no burial, I say that a stillborn child is better off than he.

    1 Samuel 27:7 (ESV)
    And the number of the days (yamim) that David lived in the country of the Philistines was a year(yamim) and four months. (emphasis mine)

         Even here in 1 Samuel we see that the lemma “yom” is used for a year and four months which is completely different than the word for night (layla) which is never used by itself for a full day, months, a year or especially a lifetime like yom is used.  Why is this important you may ask, well, in Genesis 1 we see the first time yom is used is to denote the daylight part of the day and then after we have the next phrase of evening and morning included in the first yom/day.  So, when we see the phrase “evening and morning”, this is included with the light part of the day to make a full day.  To start a yom/day first there was light, then “there was evening and morning”, both denoting a period of transition, but what is in between the “evening and morning?  Layla, nightime, complete darkness is in between, correct? According to Genesis 1:5, 8, 13, 19, 23 & 31 the “day/yom” ends with the morning.  To get a full understanding, we need to see the rest of verse 5 in Genesis 1.

    Genesis 1:3–5 (ESV)
    3And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light.
    4And God saw that the light was good. And God separated the light from the darkness.
    5God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night.
    And there was evening and there was morning, the first day.

    (emphasis mine)

         First, we will look at what evening and morning are and then look at the phrase “and there was” because this is where many people, especially Judaism, have come to the conclusion that the day begins and ends at sunset or the evening.  So it is fitting that we look at evening first and the word in the Hebrew is “ereb:”

    Dictionary of Biblical Languages with Semantic Domains:

    6847 II. עֶרֶב (ʿě·rěḇ): n.[masc.]; ≡ Str 6153; TWOT 1689a—

    1. LN 67.191 evening, sundown, i.e., the period of time related to the setting of the sun, from late or very late afternoon to the beginning of the dark night time (1Sa 14:24);

    2. LN 67.163–67.200 unit: בַּיִן הַ־ עֶרֶב (bǎ·yin hǎ- ʿě·rěḇ) twilight, dusk, i.e., the period of time between sunset and dark (Ex 12:6; 16:12; 29:39, 41; 30:8; Lev 23:5; Nu 9:3, 5, 11; 28:4, 8+);

    3. LN 67.163–67.200 night, i.e., the period of time that is after sunset and twilight, a dark time of the night (Job 7:4; Ps 30:6[EB 5]+)

         Here the word is very clear, it is the time when there is a transition from light to the point of no light and the best time of day that fits this is sunset or as we would call it, evening. Now let’s look at the Hebrew word for morning:

    Dictionary of Biblical Languages with Semantic Domains:

    1332 II. בֹּקֶר (bō·qěr): n.masc.; ≡ Str 1242; TWOT 274c—

    1. LN 67.163–67.200 morning, i.e., the early part of the daytime period, which can vary from early daybreak, to an undetermined time before midday when the sun is at its apex (1Sa 1:19), note: for another interp, of Ps 5:4b[EB 3b]+ see 1331; note: for MT text in Isa 26:9, see 7931;

    2. LN 67.163–67.200 tomorrow morning, next morning, i.e., the early part of a next day (Ex 16:12; 1Sa 19:2);

    3. LN 67.163–67.200 unit: עֶרֶב בֹּקֶר (ʿě·rěḇ bō·qěr) one day, i.e., a period of time, approximately 24 hour period (Da 8:14), note: cf. also Ge 1:5ff.

         Here the word boqer is a transition time when there is no light to a time when light is almost full.  This time is a fitting time for morning or sunrise because it is when it starts dark and then begins to get brighter and brighter until there is full light.  So, with both of these words we can clearly see both the light and dark and also the transition period where the two mix.  Now we can see that a day begins with light, includes the evening or the mixing of light and dark, then there is complete darkness ending with the morning or the mixing of dark and light.  Now for the last part of the verse that sheds ‘light’ (pun intended) on these verses: 

    Genesis 1:3–5 (ESV)
    3And God said, “
    Let there be light,” and there was light.
    4And God saw that the light was good. And God separated the light from the darkness.
    5God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And
    there was evening and there was morning, the first day.

    (emphasis mine)

        These words, “there was/yehi” is the same lemma that is used in Exodus 3:6 when Father tells Moses, “I AM/eheyeh” and in both of these verses the word means: to be, to exist, to become.  Also, we see the same word translated as “there was” is also used in v.3 for “let there be” and “there was.”  In v.3 we understand what is said that light was created or came to be as something that is past but that is consistent.  The Hebrew word is “hayah”:

    Dictionary of Biblical Languages with Semantic Domains:

    2118 הָיָה (hā·yā(h)): v.; ≡ Str 1961; TWOT 491—

    1. LN 13.1–13.47 (qal) be, i.e., to possess certain characteristics whether inherent or transitory (Ge 1:2); (nif) been (Ex 11:6; 1Ki 12:24; 2Ch 11:4; Da 2:1; Joel 2:2; Mic 2:4; Zec 8:10+);

    2. LN 13.1–13.47 (qal) be, i.e., to possess certain characteristics identical with another object (Ps 10:14);

    3. LN 13.69–13.103 (qal) be, i.e., to exist in the absolute sense (Ex 3:14);

    4. LN 13.104–13.163 (qal) happen, occur, i.e., have an event transpire (1Ki 14:3); (nif) happen (Dt 4:32; Jdg 19:30; 20:3, 12; 1Ki 1:27; Ne 6:8; Pr 13:19; Jer 5:30; 48:19; Eze 21:12[EB 7]; 39:8; Da 12:1+);

    5. LN 85.1–85.31 (qal) be, i.e., be in a place (Lev 16:17);

    6. LN 58.63–58.69 (qal) be, was, i.e., belong to a certain class (Ge 10:9);

    • This entry continues for much longer but you can continue on your own, I believe this will give you a good start to understand these verses.

    In Summary

         With all of this we can see how evening and morning were something that came to pass, in other words we see a day beginning with light, evening coming to be, night and finally morning coming to be. Day one.  Now with all of this we can look at the rest of the days of creation and see that Father creates during the light and then evening and morning come to pass, which is the end of the day.  If a day was only the evening/ereb and morning/boqer then the day/yom would only be the nighttime without the light except for the mixture of day and night.